Re: [HACKERS] Statistics "dependency"

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dean Rasheed
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Statistics "dependency"
Дата
Msg-id CAEZATCX9Azy2PTU70c84v75YQW7Gu_kwaubGZwJFiJfLJSoZuA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] Statistics "dependency"  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Statistics "dependency"  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 23 April 2017 at 03:37, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> In looking at the new multi-column statistics "dependency" option in
> Postgres 10, I am quite confused by the term "dependency".  Wouldn't
> "correlation" be clearer and less confusing as "column dependency"
> already means something else.
>

Actually, the terms "dependency" and "correlation" are both quite
broad terms that cover a whole range of other different things, and
hence could be misleading. The precise term for this is "functional
dependency" [1], so if anything, the option name should be
"functional_dependencies" or some shortening of that, keeping a part
of each of those words.

Regards,
Dean

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_dependency



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] recovery tests vs windows
Следующее
От: Michael Banck
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] A note about debugging TAP failures