On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 7:42 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Indeed, it looks like no other caller is paying attention to the result.
> We could live with the uncertainty in the back branches, and redefine
> ConditionVariableSignal as returning void in master.
+1
Could we install the sentinel and pop the first entry at the same
time, so that we're not adding an extra spinlock acquire/release?
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com