Re: GUC-ify walsender MAX_SEND_SIZE constant

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Majid Garoosi
Тема Re: GUC-ify walsender MAX_SEND_SIZE constant
Дата
Msg-id CAFWczPtj5XFf6bar-NPmgc8uvavooNdyq1q1zVyzknA=87inVA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: GUC-ify walsender MAX_SEND_SIZE constant  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: GUC-ify walsender MAX_SEND_SIZE constant  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi Andres,

On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 at 22:33, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
On 2024-01-19 23:04:50 +0330, Majid Garoosi wrote:
> Following is the description which is also written in the commit message:
> MAX_SEND_SIZE parameter was used in WALSender to limit maximum size of
> a WAL data packet sent to a WALReceiver during replication. Although
> its default value (128kB) was a reasonable value, it was written in
> 2010. Since the hardwares have changed a lot since then, a PostgreSQL
> user might need to customize this value.
> For example, if a database's disk has a high bandwidth and a high
> latency at the same time, it makes more sense to read bigger chunks of
> data from disk in each iteration. One example of such disks is a remote
> disk. (e.g. an RBD volume)

The way we read the WAL data is perfectly prefetchable by the the OS, so I
wouldn't really expect gains here.  Have you actually been able to see a
performance benefit by increasing MAX_SEND_SIZE?

Yes, I have seen a huge performance jump. Take a look at here for more info.

Best
Majid

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Erik Wienhold
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Patch: Add parse_type Function
Следующее
От: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby