On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Rafia Sabih
<rafia.sabih@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Note this:
>>
>> if (completed || !fcache->returnsSet)
>> postquel_end(es);
>>
>> When the SQL function doesn't return a set, then we can allow
>> parallelism even when lazyEval is set, because we'll only call
>> ExecutorStart() once. But my impression is that something like this:
How about taking the decision of execute_once based on
fcache->returnsSet instead of based on lazyEval?
change
+ ExecutorRun(es->qd, ForwardScanDirection, count, !es->lazyEval);
to
+ ExecutorRun(es->qd, ForwardScanDirection, count, !fcache->returnsSet);
IMHO, Robert have the same thing in mind?
>SELECT * FROM blah() LIMIT 3
>
>...will trigger three separate calls to ExecutorRun(), which is a
>problem if the plan is a parallel plan.
And you also need to test this case what Robert have mentioned up thread.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com