Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : Parallel Merge Join

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dilip Kumar
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : Parallel Merge Join
Дата
Msg-id CAFiTN-tdYpcsk7Lpv0HapcmvSnMN_TgKjC7RkmvVLZAF+XfmPg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : Parallel Merge Join  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : Parallel Merge Join  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : Parallel Merge Join  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Committed the refactoring patch with some mild cosmetic adjustments.

Thanks..
>
> As to the second patch:
>
> +        if (jointype == JOIN_UNIQUE_INNER)
> +            jointype = JOIN_INNER;
>
> Isn't this dead code?  save_jointype might that value, but jointype won't.

Yes, it is.

I have fixed this, and also observed that comment for
try_partial_mergejoin_path header was having some problem, fixed that
too.

>
> Apart from that and some cosmetic issues it looks basically OK to me
> on a first read-through.


-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pg_background contrib module proposal
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Cache Hash Index meta page.