Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dilip Kumar
Тема Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum
Дата
Msg-id CAFiTN-v0nL-KKEiqaanb=wOkSGuJ=+Dw0_3q6OaL=wLU0mCOZQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Ответы Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 7:13 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
>
> On 15/10/2019 09:37, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > While reviewing a parallel vacuum patch [1], we noticed a few things
> > about $SUBJECT implemented in commit -
> > 7df159a620b760e289f1795b13542ed1b3e13b87.
> >
> > 1. A new memory context GistBulkDeleteResult->page_set_context has
> > been introduced, but it doesn't seem to be used.
>
> Oops. internal_page_set and empty_leaf_set were supposed to be allocated
> in that memory context. As things stand, we leak them until end of
> vacuum, in a multi-pass vacuum.

Here is a patch to fix this issue.

-- 
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dave Cramer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add%r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status)
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum