Re: Feature: temporary materialized views

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Stehule
Тема Re: Feature: temporary materialized views
Дата
Msg-id CAFj8pRAWoEM3J2dKzu38SmRqdsHOMebVWWhsEEx=cAgrMySa7A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Feature: temporary materialized views  (Mitar <mmitar@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers


st 26. 12. 2018 v 18:20 odesílatel Mitar <mmitar@gmail.com> napsal:
Hi!

On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 9:00 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I think MVs that are dropped at session end are a sensible feature.

Thanks.

> I probably wouldn't go as far as allowing ON COMMIT actions, though

I agree. I do not see much usefulness for it. The only use case I can
think of would be to support REFRESH as an ON COMMIT action. That
would be maybe useful in the MV setting. After every transaction in my
session, REFRESH this materialized view.

But personally I do not have an use case for that, so I will leave it
to somebody else. :-)

> I think if you really want to do this you should just use OptTemp, and
> delete OptNoLog.

Sounds good.

OptTemp seems to have a misleading warning in some cases when it is
not used on tables though:

"GLOBAL is deprecated in temporary table creation"

Should we change this language to something else? "GLOBAL is
deprecated in temporary object creation"? Based on grammar it seems to
be used for tables, views, sequences, and soon materialized views.

This message is wrong - probably better "GLOBAL temporary tables are not supported"

Regards

Pavel

> Of course, you need to add tests and patch the docs.

Sure.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/29165.1545842105%40sss.pgh.pa.us


Mitar

--
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Mitar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Feature: temporary materialized views
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Shared Memory: How to use SYSV rather than MMAP ?