Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in postgres_fdw/deparse.c:1116

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ashutosh Bapat
Тема Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in postgres_fdw/deparse.c:1116
Дата
Msg-id CAFjFpReADDoe7P_Sgk5EYGwiB-2L_i_hT9jZWg3fU=v=34HYMw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in postgres_fdw/deparse.c:1116  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers


On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:10 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Although I have done a bit of review of this patch, it needs more
>> thought than I have so far had time to give it.  I will update again
>> by Tuesday.
>
> I've reviewed this a bit further and have discovered an infelicity.

Also, independent of the fix for this particular issue, I think it
would be smart to apply the attached patch to promote the assertion
that failed here to an elog().  If we have more bugs of this sort, now
or in the future, I'd like to catch them even in non-assert-enabled
builds by getting a sensible error rather than just by failing an
assertion.  I think it's our general practice to check node types with
elog() rather than Assert() when the nodes are coming from some
far-distant part of the code, which is certainly the case here.

I plan to commit this without delay unless there are vigorous,
well-reasoned objections.

Fine with me. Serves the purpose for which I added the Assert, but in a better manner. May be the error message can read "non-Var nodes/targets/expressions not expected in target list". I am not sure what do we call individual (whole) members of target list.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ERROR: ORDER/GROUP BY expression not found in targetlist
Следующее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Reviewing freeze map code