Re: Why PGSQL has no developments in the .NET area?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dusan Misic
Тема Re: Why PGSQL has no developments in the .NET area?
Дата
Msg-id CAGdZ+NAAS2PhuzhGo6a5g8ewKUH7=8J3fYM_ZropOtjcCbZAOA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Why PGSQL has no developments in the .NET area?  (Rohit Coder <passionate_programmer@hotmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general

I do not understand what you mean by the term sluggish?

Every .NET driver has some overhead when you first load it, and then it is being cached into memory.

I have used Npgsql and it worked great for me.

If you are not satisfied with Npgsql, try Devarts connector.

On Oct 2, 2011 5:33 AM, "Rohit Coder" <passionate_programmer@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> PgSQL has just one old NPGSQL driver for .NET, which is itself sluggish. The ODBC driver works better as compared to NPGSQL, but I suspect the ODBC driver is not the right choice for ORM framework of .NET.
>
> I want to know whether there is any efficient .NET provider and is PGSQL compatible with the .NET entity framework.
>
> Regards,
> Rohit.
>

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От:
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why PGSQL has no developments in the .NETarea?
Следующее
От: Boszormenyi Zoltan
Дата:
Сообщение: Inconsistency: varchar is equivalent to varchar(255) and also not equivalent?