Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": readonly 0 of 8192 bytes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": readonly 0 of 8192 bytes
Дата
Msg-id CAH2-Wz=zJjTb9_f61zCocGrbXPdMP7bopyUSKuKApwW=aOP=7Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": readonly 0 of 8192 bytes  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 10:08 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
>> Hmmm ... maybe we should temporarily stick in an elog(LOG) showing whether
>> a parallel build happened or not, so that we can check the buildfarm logs
>> next time we see that failure?
>
> I can do that tomorrow. Of course, it might be easier to just push the
> pending fix for the mapped relation bug, and see if that makes the
> issue go away. That would take longer, but it's also the only thing
> that's likely to be definitive anyway.

I'm going to push my fix for the relmapper.c parallel CREATE INDEX bug
tomorrow, and see what happens. I have a hard time imagining how there
could be a parallel index build on pg_class, now that Andrew has
indicated there is no reason to think that
"min_parallel_table_scan_size = 0" could slip in.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: libpq should not look up all host addresses at once
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts