Re: [HACKERS] Replication status in logical replication

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fujii Masao
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Replication status in logical replication
Дата
Msg-id CAHGQGwE2HgoZ=mjgMcvg9SO2zPDDr9d3tohcQwJvSt4Pri9MDw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Replication status in logical replication  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Replication status in logical replication
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:16 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 16 January 2018 at 06:21, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:40:43AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>>> On 9 January 2018 at 04:36, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> We're not talking about standbys, so the message is incorrect.
>>>
>>> Ah, I understood. How about "\"%s\"  has now caught up with upstream
>>> server"?
>>
>> +1.
>
> upstream is what I would have suggested, so +1 here also.
>
> Will commit.

ping?

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Enhance pg_stat_wal_receiver view to display connected host
Следующее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS