On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Manoj Govindassamy
<manoj@nimblestorage.com> wrote:
> (2) We are not comfortable moving to PGPool just for automatic failback mode
> on hot-standby failure.
Hmm.. my reply might be misleading. What I meant was to use pgpool-II
as a clusterware for PostgreSQL built-in replication, not as a replication
itself. You can health-check, do failover if necessary and manage the
PostgreSQL replication by using pgpool-II. AFAIK pgpool-II has such an
operation mode. But you are still not comfortable in using pgpool-II in
that way?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center