On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2014-03-19 02:16:00 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> > Comments of WalSndWaitForWal would need an update as well in this
>> > case. It is written on top of this function that it waits "until WAL <
>> > loc is flushed to disk".
>>
>> I don't think that comment needs to be updated because it means that
>> "until WAL < loc is flushed to the *master local* disk". It's not related to
>> the flush location that the standby returns. Anyway, I attached the patch.
>> Barring objection, I will commit this.
>
> I object on behalf of WalSndWaitForWal(). We really need the flush
> location there because otherwise we can't remove old WAL.
MyWalSnd->flush < sentPtr condition in WalSndWaitForWait() is always
true if the flush location that the client returns is invalid. Is this OK?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao