Re: PostgreSQL suitable?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Vincenzo Romano
Тема Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
Дата
Msg-id CAHjZ2x6nq3_W3BxzX2tPWZE5Y-yTWXTbniqLb2xo2N+EqbiACQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PostgreSQL suitable?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Ответы Re: PostgreSQL suitable?  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Re: PostgreSQL suitable?  (Andreas Kretschmer <andreas@a-kretschmer.de>)
Список pgsql-general
Дерево обсуждения
Sorry, my bad: I confused V10 with v11.
But accordingly to a discussion with Bruce Momjan, table partitionin V10 is little more than syntactic sugar around old-fashioned table partitioning.
Sub-table partition selection is linear in complexity.

Il 19 dic 2017 15:55, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> ha scritto:
Vincenzo Romano wrote:
> I've not tested PG10. But it's not released for production yet!

It definitely is, for a couple of months now.  10.1 (the first bugfix
release) has been out for over a month.

--
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tim Clarke
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL suitable?