Re: [PATCH] Slight improvement of worker_spi.c example

Hi Michael,

Thanks for your feedback.

> +       * The order of PushActiveSnapshot() and SPI_connect() is not really
> +       * important.
>
> FWIW, looking at the patch, I don't think that this is particularly
> useful.

Fair enough, here is the corrected patch.

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev