Re: Support logical replication of DDLs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От shveta malik
Тема Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Дата
Msg-id CAJpy0uAA0SQ0kPA5bXmrW=32p0bwFCifoKb5OSgteTjGggEkLA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Support logical replication of DDLs  (shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Support logical replication of DDLs  (shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>)
Re: Support logical replication of DDLs  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers


On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 9:11 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 5:32 PM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
<houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> Attach the new version patch set which include the following changes:
>

Few comments for ddl_deparse.c in patch dated April17:


 Few comments for ddl_json.c in the patch dated April17:

1) expand_jsonval_string()
I think we need to assert if jsonval is neither jbvString nor jbvBinary.

2) expand_jsonval_strlit()
same here, assert if not jbvString (like we do in expand_jsonval_number and expand_jsonval_identifier etc)

3) expand_jsonb_array()
arrayelem is allocated as below, but not freed.
initStringInfo(&arrayelem)

4) expand_jsonb_array(),
we initialize iterator as below which internally does palloc
it = JsonbIteratorInit(container);
Shall this be freed at the end? I see usage of this function in other files. At a few places, it is freed while not freed at other places.

5) deparse_ddl_json_to_string(char *json_str, char** owner)
str = palloc(value->val.string.len + 1);
we do  palloc here and return allocated memory to caller as 'owner'. Caller sets this 'owner' using SetConfigOption() which internally allocates new memory and copies 'owner' to that. So the memory allocated in deparse_ddl_json_to_string is never freed. Better way should be the caller passing this allocated memory to deparse_ddl_json_to_string() and freeing it when done. Thoughts?

6)expand_fmt_recursive():
value = findJsonbValueFromContainer(container, JB_FOBJECT, &key);
Should this 'value' be freed at the end like we do at all other places in this file? 


thanks
Shveta

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Julien Rouhaud
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node
Следующее
От: Denis Laxalde
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an unused port to listen