Re: error in the example given for numeric data types

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David G. Johnston
Тема Re: error in the example given for numeric data types
Дата
Msg-id CAKFQuwYPCXJ=ybtxn6BvmXYgf9VxNbxJsx7Pq0KDdo5soDGnqQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: error in the example given for numeric data types  (Priyank Rajvansh <rajvansh.priyank@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 10:50 AM Priyank Rajvansh <rajvansh.priyank@gmail.com> wrote:

First of all thanks for your reply.This mean that this was a bug in the previous versions right? 

No, it means that a prior version limitation has been lifted, so a definition that was previously undefined is now defined.  It is not a bug to choose to not implement something.

David J.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_restore mostly idle on restoring a large number of tables
Следующее
От: Chandy G
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Toasted column values during replication