Re: Some qualms with the current description of RegExp s,n,w modes.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Johnston
Тема Re: Some qualms with the current description of RegExp s,n,w modes.
Дата
Msg-id CAKFQuwYumYU723Or79gFxd-Rr8ZtvFyk98KFG0Dm0kxYDLB65Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Some qualms with the current description of RegExp s,n,w modes.  (David Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-docs
Дерево обсуждения

Or just "newline-sensitive matching" ... does "full" add anything?

​And since I'm nit-picking anyway - the word "sensitive" does nothing for me.  Simply "newline-matching" would be sufficient, ideally.  i.e., Do ". [^]" and "^$" match the newline character, or not.

[w] anchor newline-matching
[n] dot/inverse-bracket newline-matching
[s] newline-matching

These are precise, what-oriented, names compared to:

[w] record mode
[n] multi-line mode
[s] single-line mode

which are more descriptive, use-oriented, names.

Use of these label sets is not mutually exclusive...

David J.

В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Johnston
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Some qualms with the current description of RegExp s,n,w modes.
Следующее
От: David Johnston
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [9.3] Should we mention "set_config(...)" in 18.1.3 in Server Configuration?