Re: Making clausesel.c Smarter

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Rowley
Тема Re: Making clausesel.c Smarter
Дата
Msg-id CAKJS1f8oN+YqkLW-c35+3UajzHbtwo0qPH=1MjN=FfGjodAk9Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] Making clausesel.c Smarter  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Making clausesel.c Smarter  (Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>)
Re: Making clausesel.c Smarter  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 4 April 2017 at 08:24, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2017-04-03 20:59:42 +1200, David Rowley wrote:
>> Updated patch attached.
>>
>> Thanks for reviewing it.
>
> Given the time in the release cycle I'm afraid that this it's too late
> to get this into v10.  Does anybody disagree?  If not, it should be
> moved to the next CF.

I strongly disagree. The time in the release cycle is the final
commitfest. This is when patches are commited to the repository. The
exception to this is that no large invasive patches should arrive new
in the final commitfest. This is not one of those.

Tom has already mentioned he'd like to look at this. If you're not
willing, then please just don't look at it, but please also don't
remove other peoples opportunity for doing so.

Please explain your logic for thinking otherwise. Have I somehow
misunderstood what the 1 week extension means?


-- David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PATCH: recursive json_populate_record()
Следующее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash