Re: [External] Re: WAL Replication query

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От KK CHN
Тема Re: [External] Re: WAL Replication query
Дата
Msg-id CAKgGyB9bcXLHhqP=YYPZqeWKD70AUHdQENPdpszKk0kg_QRR2g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [External] Re: WAL Replication query  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
Список pgsql-admin

Yes, in that case you can lose committed data.  The normal way to avoid that is to use
synchronous replication.  That is easy to set up, but has some implications:

- it will slow down data modifications considerably
- you should have a low network latency between the machines
- the whole system becomes unavailable if the standby goes down, so have at
  least two synchronous standbys if you want good availability


Thanking  all for the prompt replies and guidance for clarifying the doubts and queries. 

Krishane
 

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Laurenz Albe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [External] Re: WAL Replication query
Следующее
От: Wells Oliver
Дата:
Сообщение: Timeline for major versions on Amazon RDS?