Re: security_definer_search_path GUC

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Marko Tiikkaja
Тема Re: security_definer_search_path GUC
Дата
Msg-id CAL9smLAR1Zg2DZzbB__Zxe1GsJG8_0m-V-V+bkgJMoz6E+cn8w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: security_definer_search_path GUC  ("Joel Jacobson" <joel@compiler.org>)
Ответы Re: security_definer_search_path GUC  ("Joel Jacobson" <joel@compiler.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 11:32 PM Joel Jacobson <joel@compiler.org> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021, at 18:36, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
The use case is: version upgrades.  I want to be able to have a search_path of something like 'pg_catalog, compat, public'.  That way we can provide compatibility versions of newer functions in the "compat" schema, which get taken over by pg_catalog when running on a newer version.  That way all the compatibility crap is clearly separated from the stuff that should be in "public".

That's a neat trick, probably the best solution in a really old PostgreSQL version, before we had extensions.

But if running a recent PostgreSQL version, with support for extensions, I think an even cleaner solution
would be to package such compatibility versions in a "compat" extension, that would just install them into the public schema.

Writing, verifying and shipping extension upgrade scripts is not pleasant.  I'd much prefer something that's integrated to the workflow I already have.
 
And if you wonder what functions in public come from the compat extension, you can use use \dx+.

They still show up everywhere when looking at "public".  So this is only slightly better, and a maintenance burden.


.m

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Marko Tiikkaja
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: security_definer_search_path GUC
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Performance degradation of REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW