> On 23. Jul, 2020, at 16:50, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > You should see what "file" reports these as, but there's a good > bet that these are 32-bit code and won't even run on Catalina.
yes, they seem pretty old:
paul@meerkat:/usr/local/lib$ file libintl.* libintl.3.4.3.dylib: Mach-O universal binary with 2 architectures: [i386:Mach-O dynamically linked shared library i386] [ppc:Mach-O dynamically linked shared library ppc] libintl.3.4.3.dylib (for architecture i386): Mach-O dynamically linked shared library i386 libintl.3.4.3.dylib (for architecture ppc): Mach-O dynamically linked shared library ppc libintl.a: Mach-O universal binary with 2 architectures: [i386:current ar archive random library] [ppc:current ar archive random library] libintl.a (for architecture i386): current ar archive random library libintl.a (for architecture ppc): current ar archive random library libintl.la: libtool library file, ASCII text
> You apparently installed *something*, or several somethings, back > in ought-six or so. Do you really remember what you were doing > back then?
I used to have an old iMac. And when I got this laptop, I did a time machine backup then and restored it to this laptop to not have to install all my software from scratch. Maybe it's old stuff from Java installations. I also have XQuartz running since ages now which has been updated from version to version, currently 2.7.11. I don't know which it could be that could be that old.