Re: Replication/cloning: rsync vs modification dates?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Sergey Konoplev
Тема Re: Replication/cloning: rsync vs modification dates?
Дата
Msg-id CAL_0b1sAQwOXWPOFuk8VJPqCfLYXGJenWM4QxdciYxW6uSmfFQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Replication/cloning: rsync vs modification dates?  (Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Replication/cloning: rsync vs modification dates?  (Michael Nolan <htfoot@gmail.com>)
Re: Replication/cloning: rsync vs modification dates?  (Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Michael Nolan <htfoot@gmail.com> wrote:
>> As I understand the docs for rsync, it will use both mod time and file size
>> if told not to do checksums.

I wonder if it is correct in general to use mtime and size to perform
these checks from the point of view of PostgreSQL.

If it works with the current version then is there a guaranty that it
will work with the future versions?

>
> Oh, so it does, I misread. Thanks! Time+size it is.
>
> ChrisA
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



--
Sergey Konoplev

a database architect, software developer at PostgreSQL-Consulting.com
http://www.postgresql-consulting.com

Jabber: gray.ru@gmail.com Skype: gray-hemp Phone: +79160686204

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "David Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Can't figure out how to use now() in default for tsrange column (PG 9.2)
Следующее
От: Michael Nolan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Replication/cloning: rsync vs modification dates?