Are we missing (void) when return value of fsm_set_and_search is ignored?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bharath Rupireddy
Тема Are we missing (void) when return value of fsm_set_and_search is ignored?
Дата
Msg-id CALj2ACXvBxB96yCQETaBmKdTsYXSbFj=BCQAeiOR2ouVM6HuTA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Are we missing (void) when return value of fsm_set_and_search is ignored?  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Re: Are we missing (void) when return value of fsm_set_and_search is ignored?  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Re: Are we missing (void) when return value of fsm_set_and_search is ignored?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Hi,

It looks like for some of the fsm_set_and_search calls whose return
value is ignored (in fsm_search and RecordPageWithFreeSpace), there's
no (void). Is it intentional? In the code base, we generally have
(void) when non-void return value of a function is ignored.

Thoughts?

With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep
Следующее
От: Daniel Gustafsson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_upgrade is failed for 'plpgsql_call_handler' handler