Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB files

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Stark
Тема Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB files
Дата
Msg-id CAM-w4HPoKR9i+xpNJMrjOFuKdT3ususw8n6HwKjRx0JTEQQRmg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 20:25, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> So this means that in less-than-bleeding-edge kernels, syncfs can
> only be regarded as a dangerous toy.  If we expose an option to use
> it, there had better be large blinking warnings in the docs.

Isn't that true for fsync and everything else related on
less-than-bleeding-edge kernels anyways?

-- 
greg



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Logical Replication vs. 2PC
Следующее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New IndexAM API controlling index vacuum strategies