That is my understanding also. However, we are getting the previously mentioned error above when trying to update a temporary table in a database that has other tables published.
I’m not sure you understand the issue. We don’t want to temporary tables replicated but they appear to be. As I mentioned, is this expected behavior? Anyone, Bueller?
Temporary tables can't be part of a replication. In logical replication perform only DML. As well as same structure must be exists on publication and subscribe side.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 10:04 PM Cory Nemelka <cnemelka@gmail.com> wrote:
The issue is the apparent replication of temporary tables. The workarounds you proposed do work but why do postgresql publications replicate temporary tables? they will not be on the subscriber so the replication will fail.
In Logical replication all tables have a valid default REPLICA IDENTITY (i.e. PK). If suppose there isn't one then You could try to set identity to full, with will use whole row as identifier ALTER TABLE name REPLICA IDENTITY FULL;
or if it has unique index ALTER TABLE name USING INDEX index_name;
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 4:16 AM Cory Nemelka <cnemelka@gmail.com> wrote:
Postgresql v10.6
After defining a publication with "FOR ALL TABLES" clause, temporary tables that are created after the definition will produce errors if they are updated,etc. The error: "cannot update table <tablename> because it does not have a replica identity and publishes updates."
Is this expected behaviour? I had understood that temporary tables were not included in publications.