Re: log_statement vs log_min_duration_statement

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Janes
Тема Re: log_statement vs log_min_duration_statement
Дата
Msg-id CAMkU=1xX6Gq_zBr3fjsceqqgKKf0UPLci4SKaqsUd=OFsddWNA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на log_statement vs log_min_duration_statement  (Atul Kumar <akumar14871@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Дерево обсуждения
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 5:33 PM Atul Kumar <akumar14871@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

I have a query about parameters  and log_statement

my postgres version is 12 and running on centos 7

my log_statement is set to "DDL".

and log_min_duration_statement is set to "1ms"

so technically it should log "ONLY DDLs" that take more than 1ms.

but to my surprise, postgres is logging DML as well which is taking more than 1ms.

That doesn't surprise me, it is just what I expected.

 

What am I missing here to understand, because as per my understanding log_statement and log_min_duration_statement are correlated, postgres should log according to log_statement parameter.

If something in the docs led you to this misunderstanding, we should identify it and fix it.  Otherwise, there isn't much we can do, except point out that that is simply not how it works.
 
Cheers,

Jeff

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Erik Wienhold
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Early binding of CURRENT_SCHEMA (Was: CREATE FUNCTION ... SEARCH {, DEFAULT | SYSTEM | SESSION })
Следующее
От: Ron
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Ad hoc SETOF type definition?