Re: Postgres as In-Memory Database?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Janes
Тема Re: Postgres as In-Memory Database?
Дата
Msg-id CAMkU=1z6P34DVzdYW7uBF9NA-WePy0jjRtXe1Pi3C7CKRwY+DA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Postgres as In-Memory Database?  (Stefan Keller <sfkeller@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Postgres as In-Memory Database?  (Stefan Keller <sfkeller@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Stefan Keller <sfkeller@gmail.com> wrote:
2013/11/18 Andreas Brandl <ml@3.141592654.de> wrote:
What is your use-case?

It's geospatial data from OpenStreetMap stored in a schema optimized for PostGIS extension (produced by osm2pgsql).

BTW: Having said (to Martijn) that using Postgres is probably more efficient, than programming an in-memory database in a decent language: OpenStreetMap has a very, very large Node table which is heavily used by other tables (like ways) - and becomes rather slow in Postgres.


Do you know why it is slow?  I'd give high odds that it would be a specific implementation detail in the code that is suboptimal, or maybe a design decision of PostGIS, rather than some high level architectural decision of PostgreSQL.

Cheers,

Jeff

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Janes
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Suggestion: pg_dump self-cleanup if out-of-disk
Следующее
От: Adrian Klaver
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Regex files are missing