Re: pg_basebackup

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Janes
Тема Re: pg_basebackup
Дата
Msg-id CAMkU=1zH=Q7EfZYOo9gS++P4PJEJsRQicWT-sbFHMOCR+P_MmA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_basebackup  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general


On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 4:13 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello.

At Mon, 23 Dec 2019 03:38:12 +0000, Daulat Ram <Daulat.Ram@exponential.com> wrote in
> thanks Adrian, what about the
> postmaster.opts file, this file was also skipped in backup.

The file is overwritten at startup so there's no point in having it in
a backup. Thus, it is deliberately excluded from a backup.

That is true and sensible, but it does seem to be contradicted by the documentation for 9.5.  In later versions, they added "except certain temporary files managed by PostgreSQL".   That addition seems to just be a correction of the docs, not something to reflect a change in actual behavior, at least in regards to postmaster.opts.

Cheers,

Jeff

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Matthias Apitz
Дата:
Сообщение: testing in ESQL/C if a CUSROR "foo" is open?
Следующее
От: Jeff Janes
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Are my autovacuum settings too aggressive for this table?