On 15 March 2017 at 21:56, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> * Sachin Kotwal (kotsachin@gmail.com) wrote:
>> Thanks. I understand this is small but new feature and not bug fix.
>> But we should be able to backpatch if there is no dependency.
>
> No, it's a new feature and won't be back-patched.
>
>> It will help users to get benefit of this feature for g96 and pg95 in RDS
>> until they will have pg10 in RDS.
>
> There is no need to wait for pg10 to be in RDS to use PG10's pg_dumpall
> against RDS databases. pg_dump and pg_dumpall are very intentionally
> designed and intended to work against older versions of PG, so as soon
> as PG10 is released you'll be able to run PG10's pg_dumpall against your
> 9.6 or 9.5 RDS databases.
However, there's no guarantee that 9.5 or 9.6 will be able to
_restore_ dumps made with Pg10's pg_dumpall and pg_dump.
We don't have any output-compatibility in pg_dump to limit it to
features from some $older_release .
But ... you can always backpatch it yourself into older Pg and build
your own pg_dump and pg_dumpall.
-- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services