Re: bugs or my fault

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Yudianto Prasetyo
Тема Re: bugs or my fault
Дата
Msg-id CAN7WH3+o2La0JCSy0d8bxgCLZgF_qEfB5JpV2zSyAYDpMJVTzQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: bugs or my fault  (Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Hello,

thanks for the information about hash partitions.

I just think that the hash partition will not speed up the Query, because we don't know the location of certain rows such as the range partition or the list partition. For example, transactions in 2000 with a range partition, we can query the "transaction2000" partition table faster than we can query the "transaction" table.

best regards

yudianto

On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 8:38 PM Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org> wrote:
We don't do just id % 3, we calculate some hash value from partition key (id) and route the tuple according this hash value. Such condition for your example:

select *, satisfies_hash_partition('myschema.customers'::regclass, 3, 0, id) as modulus3_remainder0_target_partition from myschema.cust0;

Can't illustrate more at the SQL level due to the lack of a uint64 calculations. At C level we are here: https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/REL_13_STABLE/src/backend/partitioning/partbounds.c#L4595

regards, Sergei

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Sergei Kornilov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: bugs or my fault
Следующее
От: Jef Vervecken
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: BUG #17192: The csvlog is corrupted