Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Yuriy Zhuravlev
Тема Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms
Дата
Msg-id CANiD2e9T1s=tOzE6=HEXpCQwODZQmiHJwifMG3iuNxKHkU+knw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
Sorry, but comparing lines at that state is just bullshit.

I totally disagree, proportions will be same in any case. 

Most of the comments of converted tests are missing.

Add 100-500 lines? ok. 

You detect like a third of the things that the old configure
detected.

I tried to use CMake way when it exists but for some other things, I porting checking from old autoconf system. 

The
thread safety check definitely aren't comparable. The int128 type checks
aren't comparable.

The atomics check don't guard
against compilers that allow to reference undefined functions at compile
time.

 I am not sure about "comparable",  but anyway you can make PR with a fix or at least make an issue in my tracker and I fix it. 

No LLVM detection.

Sure! Because my code base still on postgres 10. After all words about new build system and cmake here, I have no plan to support not released versions.  I am not a masochist...


Regards,

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?