Re: Mention ordered datums in PartitionBoundInfoData comment

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Julien Rouhaud
Тема Re: Mention ordered datums in PartitionBoundInfoData comment
Дата
Msg-id CAOBaU_auNOdxXRKN+a9HLGC8k__zS-iSG9AZAWNH4tuKVTb0AA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Mention ordered datums in PartitionBoundInfoData comment  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: Mention ordered datums in PartitionBoundInfoData comment  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>

Hi,

> Julien Rouhaund, who has proposed a patch for partition-wise ordering
> mentioned to me offlist that the comments for PartitionBoundInfoData
> do not mention the fact that the datums in datums array are ordered. I
> think that's important to mention there. So here's patch to do that.
>

Thanks for the patch!  I agree this should mentioned in the comment.

small typo:

+ * PartitionBoundInfoData structures for two partitioned table with
exactly same

should be "tables".

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question aboutmeaning of information for explain.depesz.com
Следующее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: BUGFIX: standby disconnect can corrupt serialized reorder buffers