Hello,
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Jeevan Ladhe
<jeevan.ladhe@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have addressed Ashutosh's and Amit's comments in the attached patch.
>
> Please let me know if I have missed anything and any further comments.
>
> PFA.
>
> Regards,
> Jeevan Ladhe
>
What is the reason the new patch does not mention of violating rows
when a new partition overlaps with default?
Is it because more than one row could be violating the condition?
--
Beena Emerson
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company