Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Atri Sharma
Тема Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture
Дата
Msg-id CAOeZVicCSmiAoLrSYAcLvKNtzuEeKMFDOotJP-tykDS6K+hs3w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Ответы Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture  ("Ben Zeev, Lior" <lior.ben-zeev@hp.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
  >We may still be able to do better than what we're doing
> today, but I'm still suspicious that you're going to run into other
> issues with having 500 indexes on a table anyway.

+1. I am suspicious that the large number of indexes is the problem
here,even if the problem is not with book keeping associated with
those indexes.

Regards,

Atri


--
Regards,

Atri
l'apprenant



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Unsigned integer types
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: repeated warnings with 9.3 Beta 1 on windows