Re: htup header reorganization breaks many extension modules

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Hitoshi Harada
Тема Re: htup header reorganization breaks many extension modules
Дата
Msg-id CAP7Qgm=8-7JWb-HfLZzXwzdJGL627Nram6-JQOk7D25q4_HeDw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на htup header reorganization breaks many extension modules  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: htup header reorganization breaks many extension modules  ("Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> I haven't followed the details of the htup header reorganization, but I
> have noticed that a number of external extension modules will be broken
> because of the move of GETSTRUCT() and to a lesser extent
> heap_getattr().  Of course some #ifdefs can fix that, but it seems
> annoying to make everyone do that.  Maybe this could be reconsidered to
> reduce the impact on other projects.
>

But it's only add #include "access/htup_details.h"?  I'd not argue
it's harmful unless I missed your point.

Thanks,
-- 
Hitoshi Harada



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: _FORTIFY_SOURCE by default?
Следующее
От: Daymel Bonne Solís
Дата:
Сообщение: system_information.triggers & truncate triggers