date_in and buffer overrun

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Hitoshi Harada
Тема date_in and buffer overrun
Дата
Msg-id CAP7QgmnEitHMozc6MwFN+uD-4CoeFMLCODdkfpdLrcKi0dSK0g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: date_in and buffer overrun
Re: date_in and buffer overrun
Список pgsql-hackers
It seems date_in() has a risk of buffer overrun.  If the input is '.',
it sets field[0] to the beginning of workbuf and goes into
DecodeDate().  This function checks null-termination of the head of
string, but it can go beyond the end of string inside the first loop
and replace some bytes with zero.  The worst scenario we've seen is
overwrite of the stack frame, in which the compiler rearranged the
memory allocation of local variables in date_in() and work_buf is at
lower address than field.

I tried to attach a patch file but failed somehow, so I paste the fix here.

Thanks,


diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/datetime.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/datetime.c
index d827d7d..b81960a 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/adt/datetime.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/datetime.c
@@ -2176,9 +2176,13 @@ DecodeDate(char *str, int fmask, int *tmask,
bool *is2digits,       while (*str != '\0' && nf < MAXDATEFIELDS)       {               /* skip field separators */
-               while (!isalnum((unsigned char) *str))
+               while (*str != '\0' && !isalnum((unsigned char) *str))                       str++;

+               /* or it may not be what we expected... */
+               if (*str == '\0')
+                       return DTERR_BAD_FORMAT;
+               field[nf] = str;               if (isdigit((unsigned char) *str))               {

-- 
Hitoshi Harada



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Selena Deckelmann
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: setting per-database/role parameters checks them against wrong context
Следующее
От: Hitoshi Harada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: date_in and buffer overrun