Re: Rejecting weak passwords

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Albe Laurenz
Тема Re: Rejecting weak passwords
Дата
Msg-id D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C203937FC1@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Rejecting weak passwords  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: Rejecting weak passwords
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I don't get why you need 'password' authentication for that.
>> The point where the password should be checked is not when
>> the user uses it to logon, but when he or she changes it.
>>
>> So in my opinion that should be:
>> This facility will require to send new and changed password to
>> the server in plain-text, so it will require SSL, and the use
>> of encrypted passwords in CREATE/ALTER ROLE will have to be
>> disabled.
>
> Note that this solution will still not satisfy the original checkbox
> requirement.

I guess I misunderstood something there, but I had assumed that the
checkbox item read something like: "Does the product offer password
policy enforcement?" (to quote Dave Page).

I understood that to mean "does the server check if a new password
complies with a certain set of rules".

Yours,
Laurenz Albe


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Application name patch - v2
Следующее
От: Alex Brasetvik
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: foreign-key inference & join removal