Greg Stark wrote:
> I suspect this is wrong for similar reasons as "pure" but I'll throw
> it out there: "hermetic"
I personally have no problem with "leakproof", but if it does not tickle
the right associations with many people:
What about "secure"? It is also not self-explanatory, but it might give
people the idea that it's more a problem of restricting access to
information
than anything else.
On the downside, "security" has been over- and abused so much already.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe