>> Any reason you are using char(3) instead of varchar(3)?
>The numbers will have 2 or 3 digits so I tried to save some space :)
Well, smallint is only 2 bytes, so it would be more compact than either
char(3) or varchar(3).
Dmitri
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
confidentialand/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any
actionin reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
receivedthis in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer