Re: Snapshot too old logging

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Brad DeJong
Тема Re: Snapshot too old logging
Дата
Msg-id F8F0ED16CB59F247B7EFD0E1DB34BC1F5CB5712C@USALWEXMBX3.infor.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Snapshot too old logging  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
<div class="WordSection1"><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">On Tue,
Nov15, 2016 at 12:20 PM Magnus Hagander wrote:</span><p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">>Is there value in showing the snapshot as well?</span><p
class="MsoNormal"><spanstyle="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> </span><p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Idon't think so. Knowing the relname let's you look at your
report/joband figure out if the access to that relation can be moved. Having the exact snapshot version isn't going to
changethat. And if you're doing auto-retry, you probably only care if it is happening on the same relation
consistently.</span></div>

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Snapshot too old logging
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol