Re: role self-revocation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Mark Dilger
Тема Re: role self-revocation
Дата
Msg-id F9EB1DD2-5739-4954-AC16-372E289A55DD@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: role self-revocation  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: role self-revocation  (Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: role self-revocation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers

> On Mar 7, 2022, at 12:01 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It's been pointed out upthread that this would have undesirable
> security implications, because the admin option would be inherited,
> and the implicit permission isn't.

Right, but with a reflexive self-admin-option, we could document that it works in a non-inherited way.  We'd just be
sayingthe current hard-coded behavior is an option which can be revoked rather than something you're stuck with. 

—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company






В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: role self-revocation
Следующее
От: Álvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: support for MERGE