Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Christopher Kings-Lynne
Тема Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess
Дата
Msg-id GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOCEJICCAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
> Actually, even for those that wuldn't need the patch ... as long as the
> "default behaviour" doesn't change, and unless there are no valid
> technical arguments around it, there is no reason why a patch shouldn't be
> included ...

Unless it's going to interfere with implementing the general case in the
future, making it a painful feature to keep backwards-compatibility with.
Which is what the discussion was about IIRC...

Chris

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Marc G. Fournier"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Discontent with development process (was:Re: pgaccess
Следующее
От: Oliver Elphick
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_dump DROP commands and implicit search paths