> > It seems to me that there's more and more need for an 'SET CONSTRAINTS
> > DISABLED' and 'SET CONSTRAINTS ENABLED' command that affects
> only foreign
> > keys.
>
> I really dislike the idea of referring to "constraints" but only affecting
> foreign key constraints.
All the other SET CONSTRAINTS statments refer only to foreign keys...
> And what would be the security/data-integrity ramifications of allowing
> this?
Well, if only super users could do it...
Chris