On Sat, 23 May 1998, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, the upshot from here is that having done "cvs checkout pgsql"
> once, I can do either
> cvs update -- within pgsql
> cvs -d blahblah checkout pgsql -- in parent directory
> and they both seem to work and do the same thing (although with no
> updates committed in the last two hours, it's hard to be sure).
>
> If I omit the -d option to the cvs checkout, it fails; it does not
> know enough to fetch the repository address from pgsql/CVS/Root.
> But cvs update is cool.
>
> Dunno why it doesn't work for Marc. I'm running cvs 1.9; you?
Yup, but I have a few suspicious on why it doesn't work that I'll
investigate on monday :)
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org