Re: pg_trigger and tgargs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephan Szabo
Тема Re: pg_trigger and tgargs
Дата
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.21.0011301536050.48480-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на pg_trigger and tgargs  (Michael Fork <mfork@toledolink.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Michael Fork wrote:

> I was wondering if someone could tell me if I have gotten the fields of
> tgargs correct:
For foreign key constraints, yes.  Other triggers can use tgargs for
whatever they want.
> <unnamed>\000 -- Constraint name?
Yes.

> foreign_table_multi\000 -- table with foreign key(s)
> primary_table_multi\000 -- table with primary key(s)
Yep.
> UNSPECIFIED\000         -- ??
What match type was specified (or unspecified if none was specified).

> foreign_int_1\000       -- 1st field in foreign key
> 
> primary_int_1\000       -- 1st field in referenced primary key
> 
> foreign_int_2\000       -- 1st field in foreign key 
> primary_int_2\000       -- 1st field in referenced primary key
2nd on the latter two, but yes in general



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: The Hermit Hacker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: beta testing version
Следующее
От: ±è°­¿í
Дата:
Сообщение: eject