On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > I think Hiroshi's complaint was that it should be discussed more.
> > > > Seems we have discussed it, and most agree on the removal.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hmm I think you are not walking a proper 'discussion first'
> > > process in the first place. You committed the removal 7 hours
> > > after you had posted the first mail of this thread.
> > > Is it sufficient ?
> >
> > Nope, a *discussion* should go for *at least* 24 hrs after the first post
> > in the discussion ... then again, similar rules should apply before
> > applying any patches in the first place ... *roll eyes*
>
> Removal seemed to obvious to discuss, I guess, and when I got on OK, I
> was on my way.
Since you obvious had to have had some sort of discussion and approval
(especially after all that you and I have discussed) for the original
patch, a similar discussion and approval should have been attained for
removing it ... someone had to have liked the original patch to have given
you the go-ahead on it, right?