Re: Postgres, fsync and RAID controller with 100M of internal cache & dedicated battery

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Smith
Тема Re: Postgres, fsync and RAID controller with 100M of internal cache & dedicated battery
Дата
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.64.0708222313270.13185@westnet.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Postgres, fsync and RAID controller with 100M of internal cache & dedicated battery  (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>)
Список pgsql-general
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Ron Johnson wrote:

> That seems to be a very extreme ratio.  Most databases do *many*
> times more reads than writes.

Yes, but the OS has a lot more memory to cache the reads for you, so you
should be relying more heavily on it in cases like this where the card has
a relatively small amount of memory.  The main benefit for having a
caching controller is fsync acceleration, the reads should pass right
through the controller's cache and then stay in system RAM afterwards if
they're needed again.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Amiel
Дата:
Сообщение: pg_dump causes postgres crash
Следующее
От: Jeff Amiel
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_dump causes postgres crash