I know there's been a certain amount of buzz over the
usefulness/methodology of the tests, but Great Bridge just published a set
of tests using "Major Proprietary #1", ...#2, etc. kind of terminology.
http://www.greatbridge.com/news/p_081420001.html
-emile
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Ian Turner wrote:
> > I am looking for a good head to head comparison of the latest
> > rdbms's and how they match up performance scalibilty out of the
> > box with POSTGRESQL.
>
> Alas, most commercial rdbms's (i.e., oracle, informix, MS SQL, etc.) do
> not allow you to publish benchmark results for their product. So there is
> no way to know.
>
> Ian Turner
> ------------ Output from gpg ------------
> gpg: Signature made Thu Aug 31 19:47:01 2000 CDT using DSA key ID D644D71A
> gpg: requesting key D644D71A from www.keyserver.net ...
> gpg: [fd 8]: read error: Connection reset by peer
> gpg: Total number processed: 0
> gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
>
>