On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, K Parker wrote:
> > Question: Why isn't 12 printed after the second SELECT statement?
>
> It's the well-known (?) problem that if any function parameter is
> NULL, they are all set to NULL. IIRC someone is working on fixing
> this...
a big thanks to you and Tom for the updates.
a note though: there are no problems with the parameters that I can see.
They're passed correctly to the c function, it's just the return type
that's messed up.
I suppose we'll just have to use 'NULL'.
BTW Is it possible to use a c-function with a prototype like the following
in postgres?
int myfunc (int id, ...);
R.